krishna_brc
01-29 12:41 PM
Not been following the dates these days. Would be nice to have this info..
1) How much time does it take for the EAD application to get processed (Texas Service center) for new EAD (not an extn)?
2) How much time does it take for the AP extension to get processed (TSC) if I were to apply for an extension of my old AP today?
Thanks all for your inputs.
I would anticipate EAD to be processed in max of 3 months and AP in 2 months.
Would also add a buffer of 2 weeks (just in case).
1) How much time does it take for the EAD application to get processed (Texas Service center) for new EAD (not an extn)?
2) How much time does it take for the AP extension to get processed (TSC) if I were to apply for an extension of my old AP today?
Thanks all for your inputs.
I would anticipate EAD to be processed in max of 3 months and AP in 2 months.
Would also add a buffer of 2 weeks (just in case).
wallpaper justin bieber kissing selena
hybrid101
04-02 10:10 AM
loved the "write a letter to become a mod" april fool joke the best:lol:
ramus
07-06 05:29 PM
All new users could do is open new thread.. Didn't we experience big outage of website.. Didn't we feel left alone when IV was down.. Why we need to create more and more threads and confuse ourself.
Why can't we follow action items.
Why can't we follow action items.
2011 Share justin
nashorn
12-18 05:53 PM
Gurus, please help. Can anybody throw some light on why my LUD has changed on I-485. Could it be because of name clearance.
Name check cleared would not result in a lud. But if you get more luds in the next couple of days, which probebly means they are processing your case, you can say your name check is cleared, because they only start process your case after name check is cleared.
Is you PD current? If not, your case cann't be approved no matter how many luds.
Name check cleared would not result in a lud. But if you get more luds in the next couple of days, which probebly means they are processing your case, you can say your name check is cleared, because they only start process your case after name check is cleared.
Is you PD current? If not, your case cann't be approved no matter how many luds.
more...
breddy2000
08-02 01:09 PM
Please close the thread if it is non sence.
Just thaugt to have a idea about how many people have missed this opprtunity.
MY PD is EB2 June 7 2006.
MC
Any Reason you said why only June 2006 PD has missed the opportunity?
Why not whole of 2006 from Jan to June 2006?
Just curious
Just thaugt to have a idea about how many people have missed this opprtunity.
MY PD is EB2 June 7 2006.
MC
Any Reason you said why only June 2006 PD has missed the opportunity?
Why not whole of 2006 from Jan to June 2006?
Just curious
Blog Feeds
07-30 06:30 PM
The American Immigration Lawyers Association (AILA) has applauded the brainstorm of ideas in a draft memo from the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS). The now-public draft, leaked without the permission of USCIS, examines the legal framework of immigration and explores possible solutions. AILA commends this reflection of the pursuit of the rule of law and the willingness of USCIS leadership to take up this thorough examination.
"We have in the past seen many attempts to scour the law to find justification for draconian, and ultimately unhelpful, ways to make immigrants' lives miserable," said AILA president David Leopold. "This draft document tries to think through ways to make the legal immigration system work in support of sensible law enforcement. It respects the law and respects the people who must deal with the law. For that, the administration is to be congratulated, even if none of the proposals is ever carried out." He added that many of these proposals should be carried out. Long-needed regulations to help children and crime victims caught in the system should be published. Men and women fighting for America in the U.S. military should have the comfort of knowing that their families are safe from being deported. Immigration policies that encourage investment in America and creation of jobs should be emphasized and expanded. These are but a few of several excellent proposals in this document.
"We will never effectively address illegal immigration until we develop a legal immigration system that actually works and that offers people a realistic alternative to illegality," added AILA Executive Director Crystal Williams. "Congress has thus far refused to act. Administration officials at least are trying to find ways to help fill this vacuum," Williams stated.
More... (http://www.visalawyerblog.com/2010/07/san_diego_immigration_lawyer_d_1.html)
"We have in the past seen many attempts to scour the law to find justification for draconian, and ultimately unhelpful, ways to make immigrants' lives miserable," said AILA president David Leopold. "This draft document tries to think through ways to make the legal immigration system work in support of sensible law enforcement. It respects the law and respects the people who must deal with the law. For that, the administration is to be congratulated, even if none of the proposals is ever carried out." He added that many of these proposals should be carried out. Long-needed regulations to help children and crime victims caught in the system should be published. Men and women fighting for America in the U.S. military should have the comfort of knowing that their families are safe from being deported. Immigration policies that encourage investment in America and creation of jobs should be emphasized and expanded. These are but a few of several excellent proposals in this document.
"We will never effectively address illegal immigration until we develop a legal immigration system that actually works and that offers people a realistic alternative to illegality," added AILA Executive Director Crystal Williams. "Congress has thus far refused to act. Administration officials at least are trying to find ways to help fill this vacuum," Williams stated.
More... (http://www.visalawyerblog.com/2010/07/san_diego_immigration_lawyer_d_1.html)
more...
sledge_hammer
06-25 12:08 PM
The date you sign the form.
What date should we write on the form beside signature if we are planing to send the packet by 1st july .
What date should we write on the form beside signature if we are planing to send the packet by 1st july .
2010 Selena Gomez kissing under
lonelystar
10-02 10:28 AM
Thank you for your reply.
Even my check is not cashed yet!
Do you know how long it took for the check to get cashed for your friend?
Even my check is not cashed yet!
Do you know how long it took for the check to get cashed for your friend?
more...
quizzer
08-29 07:14 PM
Last week i received the letter about my RFE for my I140 which they received on Feb 8, 2007. I'm a EB3 category from Bangladesh.
USCIS requested for the tax information of the company
My W2 for last year and
My Pay Stub....
Is there anything else extra i have the provide. do i have to worry about anything towards my approval or this is just a regular process to go through.
Was it from texas or nebraska?
USCIS requested for the tax information of the company
My W2 for last year and
My Pay Stub....
Is there anything else extra i have the provide. do i have to worry about anything towards my approval or this is just a regular process to go through.
Was it from texas or nebraska?
hair Justin Bieber Selena Gomez
Blog Feeds
02-10 08:50 AM
VIA USCIS.GOV
In November 2010, USCIS transferred approximately 36,000 Immediate
Relative petitions from�our California Service Center to our Texas
Service Center. We anticipated that this redistribution�of work would
result in more timely adjudication of these petitions. Due to a number
of�unforeseen circumstances at our Texas Service Center, many of these
cases have not been�processed and are beyond our estimated processing
times. We sincerely regret any inconvenience�this may have caused you
and we are making every effort to remedy this situation as soon as
possible.
On Feb. 7, 2011, we implemented a rapid response plan to expedite the
adjudication of these�petitions. We have transferred a large number of
these Immediate Relative petitions back to our�California Service
Center to take advantage of resources currently available to
immediately�process these cases. Petitioners will see an action such
as an approval, denial or a Request for�Evidence (RFE) on their case
from our California or Texas Service Centers by the end of�February.
Additionally, we have briefed the Department of State’s National Visa
Center about�these cases.
We encourage you to monitor the progress of your case by accessing My
Case Status online. If�you do not see any action on your case, such as
an approval, denial or an RFE, by March 1, 2011�you may contact USCIS
at: I-130Inquiries.Tsc@dhs.gov
We remain committed to the prompt resolution of all pending cases and
will provide updates on�our progress in the coming weeks.
More... (http://ashwinsharma.com/2011/02/09/uscis-alert-about-its-intention-to-expedite-adjudication-of-delayed-forms-i130-that-were-transferred-from-csc-to-tsc-in-november-2010-the-alert-advises-that-petitioners-will-see-an.aspx?ref=rss)
In November 2010, USCIS transferred approximately 36,000 Immediate
Relative petitions from�our California Service Center to our Texas
Service Center. We anticipated that this redistribution�of work would
result in more timely adjudication of these petitions. Due to a number
of�unforeseen circumstances at our Texas Service Center, many of these
cases have not been�processed and are beyond our estimated processing
times. We sincerely regret any inconvenience�this may have caused you
and we are making every effort to remedy this situation as soon as
possible.
On Feb. 7, 2011, we implemented a rapid response plan to expedite the
adjudication of these�petitions. We have transferred a large number of
these Immediate Relative petitions back to our�California Service
Center to take advantage of resources currently available to
immediately�process these cases. Petitioners will see an action such
as an approval, denial or a Request for�Evidence (RFE) on their case
from our California or Texas Service Centers by the end of�February.
Additionally, we have briefed the Department of State’s National Visa
Center about�these cases.
We encourage you to monitor the progress of your case by accessing My
Case Status online. If�you do not see any action on your case, such as
an approval, denial or an RFE, by March 1, 2011�you may contact USCIS
at: I-130Inquiries.Tsc@dhs.gov
We remain committed to the prompt resolution of all pending cases and
will provide updates on�our progress in the coming weeks.
More... (http://ashwinsharma.com/2011/02/09/uscis-alert-about-its-intention-to-expedite-adjudication-of-delayed-forms-i130-that-were-transferred-from-csc-to-tsc-in-november-2010-the-alert-advises-that-petitioners-will-see-an.aspx?ref=rss)
more...
number30
04-21 11:49 AM
I am married to GC holder who is becoming USC on April 30. so i am sending my AOS application on May 1. Dont you think i am still in status since my H1b extension petition is pending????
h1bdudue1
Yes you are in Status assuming that your H1 will be approved.
h1bdudue1
Yes you are in Status assuming that your H1 will be approved.
hot Justin Bieber and Selena Gomez
mdcowboy
12-31 04:31 PM
I have realised that all Legal Immigration hopes ,in this country of dreams, are futile and there are better things in life than just to wait / hope for a change.
I am making a resolution , not to worry for Green card and priority data in the coming year :).
I am in the same boat with you. :o :rolleyes:
I am making a resolution , not to worry for Green card and priority data in the coming year :).
I am in the same boat with you. :o :rolleyes:
more...
house Justin Bieber and Selena Gomez
amoljak
03-28 03:49 PM
Bush said he wants to improve the working visas, I think the prority needs to offer to Canadians because Canadinas use the same language and education system, the distance is closer. We need to call all the senetors, the working visas.etc. need to go to Canadina citizens first.
I agree. For the genero city of canedians for using the same langwage, the goverment also pay for at least one ice hoky rink in every city. But what about the French canadians.. they should instead be called freedom canadians and directly get a green card...
I agree. For the genero city of canedians for using the same langwage, the goverment also pay for at least one ice hoky rink in every city. But what about the French canadians.. they should instead be called freedom canadians and directly get a green card...
tattoo Justin Bieber amp; Selena Gomez
DyersEve
10-01 03:27 PM
yeah, on both pics i was just randomly doing things and hoping it would be cool when i was done...but anyway, thanks for input i'll keep at it.
more...
pictures hairstyles justin bieber and
Rb_newsletter
01-27 12:29 PM
Why this is posted here? It was published in Aug 2002 and that too in anti website. Guys don't give publicity for antis here.
dresses girlfriend justin bieber and
abhijitp
02-11 01:47 AM
My company has decided to transfer all cases to a new attorney, and I am planning to go with the decision.
Therefore we need to file a new G-28 (Notice of Entry of Appearance as Attorney or Represesentative).
The form pre-filled by the new attorney says:
In re: All Immigration Matters on behalf of XYZ
Is it okay to sign on something like this? Or am I giving away permission for much more than they need, without knowing!
My AOS(and EAD, AP) applications filed in July 2007 all had separate G-28 forms which said:
In re: I-485 for XYZ on the G-28 pertaining to my I-485,
In re: I-131 for XYZ on the G-28 pertaining to my I-131,
In re: I-765 for XYZ on the G-28 pertaining to my I-765
Hopefully it is okay to give a permission for "all immigration matters" but wanted to double check, just in case!
Thanks!
Therefore we need to file a new G-28 (Notice of Entry of Appearance as Attorney or Represesentative).
The form pre-filled by the new attorney says:
In re: All Immigration Matters on behalf of XYZ
Is it okay to sign on something like this? Or am I giving away permission for much more than they need, without knowing!
My AOS(and EAD, AP) applications filed in July 2007 all had separate G-28 forms which said:
In re: I-485 for XYZ on the G-28 pertaining to my I-485,
In re: I-131 for XYZ on the G-28 pertaining to my I-131,
In re: I-765 for XYZ on the G-28 pertaining to my I-765
Hopefully it is okay to give a permission for "all immigration matters" but wanted to double check, just in case!
Thanks!
more...
makeup Justin Bieber and Selena Gomez
ho_gaya_kaya_?
11-20 08:41 PM
Another rule of thumb is that if you do not know whether your date is current or not- then you are probably not current :)
j/k...
j/k...
girlfriend Justin Bieber and Selena Gomez
senk1s
09-12 02:21 PM
to send applications to a wrong center and they'll(USCIS) move it around.
I'm not sure of the dates, someone else might reply
was your 140 approved at TSC? i read somewhere that 485 goes to the same place where 140 was approved. you may want to ask your attorney why they sent to TSC
I'm not sure of the dates, someone else might reply
was your 140 approved at TSC? i read somewhere that 485 goes to the same place where 140 was approved. you may want to ask your attorney why they sent to TSC
hairstyles Justin Bieber and Selena Gomez
Blog Feeds
08-10 10:00 AM
The Department of Labor (DOL) issued new PERM FAQs (http://www.h1b.biz/lawyer-attorney-1135851.html) on August 3, 2010. The issues addressed by DOL in this round of FAQs include expedite requests, how to document the use of an employee referral program, unsolicited documentation and what constitutes a "business day" for purposes of posting the Notice of Filing. Within the FAQs, DOL states the following:
* Expedite Requests - DOL clarifies that the Office of Foreign Labor Certification (OFLC), as a matter of long-standing policy, will not accept requests to expedite PERM applications;
* Employee Referral Programs (ERP) - DOL states that an employer can document its use of an ERP with incentives by providing dated copies of its notices or memoranda advertising the program and specifying the incentives offered. The employer must document the existence of the ERP, and that its employees were aware of the vacancy of the specific position for which certification is being sought. This can be achieved through posting on the employer's website. However, the physical Notice of Filing shall not be sufficient for this purpose;
* Unsolicited Documentation - DOL emphasizes that if unsolicited documentation is provided to the OFLC in support of a pending PERM application, then the application will automatically be placed in the audit queue;
* Business Day - As part of the required recruitment procedures to support a PERM application, a Notice of Filing must be physically posted for 10 consecutive business days. The OFLC clarifies that for purposes of the Notice of Filing, a business day will be defined as Monday through Friday, except for Federal holidays.
If you need support with your PERM case, feel free to email me. (http://www.h1b.biz/lawyer-attorney-1111083.html)
More... (http://www.visalawyerblog.com/2010/08/perm_labor_certification_dol_p.html)
* Expedite Requests - DOL clarifies that the Office of Foreign Labor Certification (OFLC), as a matter of long-standing policy, will not accept requests to expedite PERM applications;
* Employee Referral Programs (ERP) - DOL states that an employer can document its use of an ERP with incentives by providing dated copies of its notices or memoranda advertising the program and specifying the incentives offered. The employer must document the existence of the ERP, and that its employees were aware of the vacancy of the specific position for which certification is being sought. This can be achieved through posting on the employer's website. However, the physical Notice of Filing shall not be sufficient for this purpose;
* Unsolicited Documentation - DOL emphasizes that if unsolicited documentation is provided to the OFLC in support of a pending PERM application, then the application will automatically be placed in the audit queue;
* Business Day - As part of the required recruitment procedures to support a PERM application, a Notice of Filing must be physically posted for 10 consecutive business days. The OFLC clarifies that for purposes of the Notice of Filing, a business day will be defined as Monday through Friday, except for Federal holidays.
If you need support with your PERM case, feel free to email me. (http://www.h1b.biz/lawyer-attorney-1111083.html)
More... (http://www.visalawyerblog.com/2010/08/perm_labor_certification_dol_p.html)
ivgclive
12-11 12:36 PM
No. He got the new I797 recently and does'nt have VISA.
Thats what probably triggered the 221(g).
They have to verify documents on his visa.
IV had few posts on this earlier in 2007, search for that. You can find some good information.
Thats what probably triggered the 221(g).
They have to verify documents on his visa.
IV had few posts on this earlier in 2007, search for that. You can find some good information.
Shevchuk
04-25 12:26 PM
Try BoxedApp SDK (http://boxedapp.com/)
No comments:
Post a Comment